Thursday, 24 September 2015


Islamic Catechism and Animal Sacrifice


Tomorrow the Muslims in many parts of the world will celebrate the festival of Eid-ul-Adha (Bakrid). I've always questioned the practice of animal 'sacrifice' during this festival and have faced the wrath of my Muslim friends. Some of them term me as 'kafir'. Unlike most pseudo-religious people, I accept I'm not adherently religious. Well, I may not be a true Muslim but then who is a true Muslim? Today everyone is in a race to prove that they are more authentic Muslims than others. So how does one identify a true Muslim? Islam is considered to be a scientific religion by the Muslims. It gives a test known as the 'Five Pillars of Islam', to check the authenticity of a believer. The five obligations that Muslims must satisfy include-


1. Belief in Allah and his messenger Prophet Mohammed
2. Prayers - Five times a day
3. Charity to the poor
4. Fasting during the month of Ramzan
5. Pilgrimage to Mecca

Anyone who fulfills the above five obligations is a true Muslim. So now the question arises, "Is Qurbani (Animal Sacrifice) necessary in Islam?" If yes, then why is it not included in the fundamental pillars? Muslims say that they perform it to commemorate the sacrifice of Abraham and Ismail. In the holy Quran, Allah never asked Abraham to kill his son but it was Abraham and Ismail's willingness to make the ultimate sacrifice—Abraham of his son, Ismail of his own life. Sacrifice means giving up something valued for other considerations. Both Abraham and Ismail were able to transcend notions of self and false attachment to the material realm, thus removing a veil between themselves and Allah.

Islam was born in the desert of Arabia in the late 6th century AD. In those days, people in those regions were mostly nomads and where settlements were present, the society was principally pastoral. An animal was the most prized possession for a man. The concept of animal sacrifice was present in the tribal Semitic society even before the birth of Islam. Animals were sacrificed very often to please various deities. Looking at it in the Islamic context, when an animal used to be slaughtered to commemorate Abraham's sacrifice, a man used to sacrifice a part of his livelihood, which displayed his zeal to forgo materialistic comfort to satisfy the will of Allah. This tribal Semitic tradition of animal slaughter has continued since then.

But the times have changed now. The present society is not what it used to be in those days. Today a man purchases an animal a few days before Eid, slaughters it on the day of Eid, distributes a portion of the meat among the people in the society and keeps the rest for himself. When there is no element of attachment with the animal then how does it become a sacrifice? Isn't it a mere tokenism? What is the relevance of this so-called sacrifice in the contemporary world? Some people justify it on the ground that a portion of the meat is distributed among the poor, thus giving them a chance to taste something that they consider as a delicacy. Although the argument is fair enough, but when so many animals are slaughtered in a single day, the meat needs to be stored for days together which often leads to wastage. Why not make better arrangements so that the poor and needy are not left to starve on other days as well.

Religious practice is a sensitive issue and Muslims have particularly been very conservative about their religion. There is a consensus among most Islamic scholars that every verse in the Quran is associated with some context. Without the contexts, the verses have no meaning. At a time, when acute poverty, corruption, illiteracy, fundamentalism, and terrorism have torn apart the Muslim world, it becomes essential to rethink what would be a real sacrifice for a Muslim to satisfy Allah's will. Are we really following the spirit of Islam? It is the spirit that needs to be upheld and not the letters.

Wednesday, 29 October 2014

                                 Can India Win a War With Pakistan?

Over the last few months there have been continued cease fire violations along the Indo-Pak border. Many believe that diplomacy with Pakistan has failed terribly. The 'patriots' in India want nothing short of a war with Pakistan. The question that arises now is, "what should be India's response?" Is war a solution? If yes, then can India win a war with Pakistan?

Why continued firing along the LoC?

There are several possible reasons for the continued firing along the LoC. Firstly, the civilian-army relationship in Pakistan is going through a terrible phase. It is an attempt by the Pakistani army to create insecurity along the border. This will help them gain public sympathy and support.
Secondly, the Pakistani firing is largely concentrated on civilian areas along the border. This is a part of an engineered strategy to provoke India to mobilise its troops and relocate civilians to depth, thereby facilitating an easy influx. Militancy in the Kashmir valley has reduced over the last few years. Maintaining a status quo in the influx can help the Pakistani Army and the ISI to revive the separatist movement in Kashmir. In short, the firing along the LoC is an orchestrated plan by the Pakistani Army to provoke India. The Pakistani army believes that it can take a risk of escalation in the back drop of its nuclear capability.

Is war a solution?

For a while let's keep the nuclear arsenal of the two countries aside. Let's not question the might of the Indian Army to destroy Pakistan. But will India benefit by defeating an established government in Pakistan? It will only throw Pakistan in the hands of radical Islamists and jeopardize India's chance of becoming a superpower.
Indian economy is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. India has an ambitious plan to become a global player. It is certainly not in the best interest of India to have an unstable, Iraq like neighbour. India can never win a war with Pakistan. War in itself would be the biggest defeat of India's national interests. In fact that is what Pakistan wants.

What should be India's response?

Firstly India needs to give a swift, effective and a very controlled response to the Pakistani provocations. Secondly India should expose Pakistan's nefarious designs in Kashmir and its boorish attempts to escalate tension along the border. Indian diplomacy has to pressurize the world to force Pakistan to mend its way. The Indian government also needs to speed up the reconstruction, relief and rehabilitation work in the flood affected Kashmir to make sure that the youths are not misguided by the separatist forces.
Diplomacy with Pakistan has to go on but India has to make it very clear that it wants peace but will not capitulate to such provocations. India must whole heartedly help Pakistan in humanitarian works like polio eradication and flood rehabilitation. If there is something that can help India in the long run, then it is a lobby in Pakistan that depends on India for profits.